Here are a few of my struggles so far:
1. Much of the information for City Council meetings is presented in a consent agenda form. If I understand that correctly, the members have already examined the materials and discussed them before the City Council Meeting. So what we get by the time something is voted on, the public may or may not have a chance to speak to the issues. This is a practical matter in most cases as not everything can be discussed with the public.
2. There is a lot of material to look through and try to get a grasp on. There are many areas that are beyond my current understanding. I am not sure how the Supervisor's r City Council members are able to grasp the contents. It could be very easy to just vote the way others do or to vote on something you don't have all the facts for. The Council and Supervisors' knowledge on any given issue may be based on information given to them wholly , or in part , by the individual departments.
3. Many times when things require that there be a public hearing before they come to the agenda, it is difficult to locate the times and places for those public hearings.
4. The information we as citizens, are asked to comment on is sometimes incomplete. We are asked to assent to something before we have all the facts. It seems like it would be better if we could be presented more than just a thumbnail sketch.
5. The dollar amounts on some projects are so large that it is easy as a citizen to stop reading at that point. We may not have a frame of reference as to whether a listed amount is customary, reasonable or even imaginable. The resolutions use language that states the bids were reasonable and responsible. we just have to take the word of those who deal with these things every day that this is true.
all of the above are merely issues I personally am contemplating. I am more than willing to have others let me know how they have navigated the system.
No comments:
Post a Comment